Gambling Regulation News

Evoke in £225M merger talks with Bally's Intralot unit

Evoke, owner of William Hill and 888, enters merger discussions with Bally's Intralot unit in a potential £225 million deal amid financial strain.

Maryna Shevchuk
Maryna Shevchuk

Apr 23, 2026 · 4 min read

Updated May 12, 2026

Evoke in £225M merger talks with Bally's Intralot unit

Evoke, the struggling owner of William Hill and 888 brands, has confirmed merger negotiations with Intralot, a division of Bally's Corporation, in a potential deal valued at £225 million. The proposed transaction would value Evoke shares at 50 pence each, representing a significant premium to recent trading levels.

Merger Structure and Timeline

The proposed deal would primarily operate as a stock exchange with a partial cash alternative, though both parties emphasize that no final agreement has been reached. Intralot faces a critical deadline of 5:00 PM on May 18th to either submit a firm offer or withdraw from negotiations entirely.

Remove the Spanish translation block. The English quote should stand alone without the non-English translation.

Evoke has enlisted Morgan Stanley and Rothschild & Co as financial advisors to evaluate the proposal and guide the process forward.

Understanding Stock Exchange Mergers

In stock exchange mergers, shareholders of the target company receive shares in the acquiring company rather than cash. The partial cash alternative allows some shareholders to opt for immediate liquidity instead of equity ownership in the combined entity, providing flexibility for different investor preferences.

Financial Pressure Mounts

The merger talks emerge as Evoke grapples with severe financial distress following its ambitious expansion strategy. The company, previously known as 888 Holdings, acquired William Hill's network of 1,400 betting shops for £2.2 billion four years ago in what now appears to be an overextended bet.

Since that acquisition, Evoke's share value has plummeted nearly 90%, while the company's net debt has ballooned to approximately £1.8 billion. This massive debt burden towers over the company's current market capitalization of roughly £175 million, creating an unsustainable financial structure.

Financial MetricAmountImpact
William Hill Acquisition Cost£2.2 billion4 years ago
Current Net Debt£1.8 billionUnsustainable burden
Current Market Cap£175 million90% decline
Annual Tax Impact£135 millionNew regulatory costs

Regulatory Headwinds Intensify

The proposed merger comes amid unprecedented regulatory pressure in the UK gambling sector. The government has dramatically increased tax burdens, raising online gaming taxes from 21% to 40% and sports betting taxes from 15% to 25%.

CEO Per Widerström has estimated these tax changes alone could cost Evoke up to £135 million annually, further straining the company's already precarious financial position.

Strategic Restructuring Underway

In response to these mounting pressures, Evoke has initiated significant operational changes. The company plans to close approximately 200 William Hill physical stores across the UK, with closures beginning in May. This represents a substantial downsizing of the retail footprint acquired in the costly William Hill deal.

The company withdrew financial forecasts in January while conducting a comprehensive strategic review, signaling uncertainty about its future operational structure and financial trajectory.

Market Response

Investors reacted positively to the merger announcement, with Evoke shares climbing to £0.43 at market opening from the previous close of £0.38, representing approximately 13% gains as markets digested the potential acquisition.

Strategic Implications for UK Gaming

This potential consolidation reflects broader challenges facing the UK gambling industry, where operators struggle to maintain profitability amid escalating regulatory costs and shifting consumer preferences. The merger could signal the beginning of further industry consolidation as smaller operators seek scale to survive mounting pressures.

The outcome of these negotiations will likely influence strategic planning across the sector, particularly for companies balancing retail and digital operations in an increasingly challenging regulatory environment.

According to AzarPlus.

Legal Disclaimer

This content reflects a general overview of regulatory frameworks based on publicly available information. It does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion. iGamingWriter.blog disclaims any liability arising from reliance on this material.

Maryna Shevchuk

Written by

Maryna Shevchuk

Content Partnership Manager

Maryna has been part of the We–Right™ Factory team since 2018, working directly with operators, affiliates, and agencies on content planning and delivery. Her background in copywriting gives her a hands-on understanding of iGaming briefs, regulatory nuances, and market-specific requirements. On the blog, Maryna covers client-side content operations and B2B collaboration patterns in the iGaming industry.

iGaming content partnershipsB2B content operationsaffiliate content managementregulatory content requirements

Content production

Need iGaming content writing?

SEO articles, sportsbook copy, localization, and compliance-aware writing for operators and affiliates.

iGaming content writing services
Weekly iGaming Digest

Enjoyed this article?

Get regulation updates, content insights, and market news delivered to your inbox every week.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.